The Political Game: Understanding the Accusations Against Vice President Sara Duterte
In recent months, the Philippine government has been at the center of intense political debates and investigations, with Vice President Sara Duterte facing numerous accusations. Legislative hearings led by various committees, including the Quad Comm, Tri-Comm, and Huwad-Comm, have scrutinized multiple issues in an apparent attempt to discredit and undermine both VP Duterte and former President Rodrigo Roa Duterte. These hearings have covered a range of topics, from alleged extrajudicial killings to POGO operations and the controversial use of confidential and intelligence funds. However, despite the media hype and political spectacle, none of these issues have resulted in solid legal grounds to hold VP Sara Duterte accountable. Instead, it has become evident that this is nothing more than a political tournament—an orchestrated game designed to influence public perception rather than seek genuine justice.
One of the most sensationalized accusations involves VP Sara Duterte’s alleged involvement in extrajudicial killings during her father’s administration. Opponents have attempted to link her to past operations and controversial policies, yet no concrete evidence has been presented that directly implicates her in any wrongdoing. Additionally, the ongoing discussion surrounding POGO operations has been used as a tool to associate the Duterte family with illegal activities. While hearings continue to bring forth resource persons who claim to have inside knowledge, their testimonies often lack substantial proof that could lead to any legal action. These hearings appear to be less about uncovering the truth and more about fueling a narrative meant to tarnish the Dutertes’ political reputation.
Despite the numerous accusations, none have been used as solid grounds for filing criminal cases against VP Sara Duterte. The most recent recommendation from the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) involves charges of grave threats and inciting to sedition. This stems from an alleged statement made by VP Duterte during a private Zoom meeting, where she reportedly made remarks about retaliation in the event of her assassination. While the NBI claims there is probable cause, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has set a higher bar by requiring not just probable cause but certainty of conviction before filing a case. This move has shifted the focus from mere allegations to the need for compelling evidence, making it clear that political accusations alone are insufficient to hold VP Sara Duterte legally accountable.
The case of grave threats and inciting to sedition is considered a bailable offense, making it a relatively minor charge in the grand scheme of political and legal battles. If the prosecution is genuinely determined to hold VP Duterte accountable, they should focus on more substantial allegations, such as plunder or violations of anti-graft and corruption laws. Rather than relying on political narratives and weak evidence, investigators should gather concrete proof that could lead to a legitimate conviction. If there were indeed misappropriations in the P125 million confidential and intelligence fund, authorities should work on building a strong case under plunder or malversation of funds. Without solid evidence, these accusations remain as mere political tactics rather than legal infractions.
Ultimately, the ongoing investigations and media discussions reflect the reality of Philippine politics—where power struggles and political maneuvering overshadow the pursuit of truth and justice. These hearings and allegations seem strategically designed to weaken VP Sara Duterte’s political standing rather than to uphold the rule of law. It is crucial for the public to remain critical of the narratives being pushed in mainstream and social media. To truly understand the situation, one must look beyond political theatrics and seek factual, unbiased information. For more insights into these pressing issues, consider watching informative videos that expose the reality of this ongoing political game.